Yikes- it has been over a year since I last wrote anything on here, but recently, I was asked to write an article for my college magazine and (although Linacre Lines) had first publishing rights, I thought I'd whack it on here for those of you who don't have access to that high-brow and high impact publication.
We’re all used to a bit of
geekery in Oxford. For most of us, reading around our subject isn't just a
matter of making sure that our research sounds extremely relevant and important
to a funding body, but an actual pleasure. Maybe I exaggerate, but I'm basically asking for your forgiveness and understanding as I get WAY too into a
topic very tenuously linked to my subject for my own good. And for pretending
that food can be an academic subject. Although I'm not the first person to have
done that- there’s actually a guy who calls himself a Molecular Gastronomist.
His name is Hervé This and he is really a physical chemist who likes to play
with food. Sometimes he succeeds in making it dreadfully boring (“Algae
contains fibres whose nutritional value is comparable to that of vegetable
fibres.” Yawn!), but other times, he comes up trumps and gives some great tips
on how to make a soufflé rise, or indulges me in my gluttony with pieces
entitled “In Praise of Fats.” Amen to that! So I decided to take up his mantle
and try to find and impart some (possibly a little bit) fun, scientific food
facts, which satisfy the chemist in me and are mildly entertaining to most
people who take an interest in what they put in their mouth.
For a good while now, I have been
cataloguing a list of intriguing facts about bananas (I did ask for your
forgiveness and understanding). This all started with the wonderful myth that
an Oxford interview candidate was once asked to tell their interviewer about a
banana. I sincerely doubt that this was the case, but began to ponder what on
earth my response to such a question would be. I presume that in a Chemistry
interview, some level of scientific detail would be required, so instead of
describing majestic curvature and optimistic shades of yellow, I set about some
taxonomy, inorganic chemistry and a touch of biochemistry.
My first revelation on my magical
journey to understand this mystical fruit was that the banana ‘tree’ is
actually… a herb. This nugget of knowledge was received with much scepticism by
my friends (“Yeah, yeah Becky, next you’ll be telling me that a strawberry is
actually a fish”) but a triumphant Google search- I didn’t say that this would
be well researched!- revealed that I was, in fact, correct. The banana plant is
of the herbaceous genus Musa, with
the fruit we eat coming from the species Musa
acuminata and Musa balbisiana.
The herbaceousness of the banana is due to its trunk being comprised of leaves,
rather than of woody matter. Who would have thought? So, with those facts under
my belt, maybe the Plant Sciences department would have me (possibly Classics,
too, because of the Latin). But what about the Chemistry?
Doubtless many of you know that
bananas are extremely rich in potassium. Possibly fewer of you know that this
renders them a tad radioactive. An isotope (that is, a version of an element
with the same number of protons but different number of neutrons) of potassium-40
(40K) is radioactive, as it decays to calcium-40 via emission of an
electron or to argon-40 via the emission of a gamma ray and a neutrino. Sounds
quite scary, doesn’t it? But don’t worry, the amount of the radioactive
potassium in each banana is very low, about 0.045mg, which equates to 0.1μSv
radiation, so eating one a day isn’t going to cause you much damage. Some
jokers at a U.S. think tank came up with the idea of the “Banana Equivalent
Dose” to gauge the levels of radiation emitted by more strongly radioactive
items. I’m not sure how useful it is to know that you absorb the same amount of
radiation from a chest X-ray as you would from eating two hundred bananas, but
I feel strangely reassured. Excellent. Chemistry covered.
Now, finally, the biochemistry.
Have you ever seen those banana hooks? The ones you are meant to hang your
bananas on instead of just chucking them into the bottom of the fruit bowl.
Well, it turns out that they are not for purely aesthetic reasons, which is, I
am sure, why people buy them. If this was an Art History interview and I were
waxing lyrical about sunny hues and crooked forms, then I know that those hooks
would be instrumental in my answer. As it is, they can also play a part in my
scientific missive. Putting bananas in the fruit bowl is a bad idea. Fruits
give off ethylene gas, which is a very simple organic molecule and a plant
ripening hormone. In the fruit bowl, the
concentration of this gas in the atmosphere surrounding the fruit is high,
causing the bananas and other fruit to ripen quickly and resulting in acute
sadness when you find that your recently wonderfully yellow and firm fruit is
now a squishy brown mess and devastatingly inedible. Unless that’s how you like
your bananas, in which case throw them into the fruit bowl at your heart’s
content.
So there we are. The next time
you are being interviewed and the subject of bananas comes up, you too will be
able to bore the pants off your prospective future employer and compromise your
future to boot!